Floods of 2000 linked to global warming

By Rob Plastow
This week the science journal Nature published two major pieces of research that may change the way we think about observing the links between single events and global warming.

One of the studies focuses on an event that can easily be recalled to memory by people in the UK of voting age, and can potentially make connections in the mind between then, now and climate change in a way that heretofore would have mostly resided in speculation. In doing so, it helps to make global warming more tangible, albeit still ever elusive and complex.

Back in 2000, I used to walk to college everyday from my then home of the Quay in Exeter, Devon. One September afternoon I clearly remember getting drenched in a downpour that had been a part of a spate of rain that had caused the River Exe to burst its banks. Much of the Exe Valley between Exeter and Tiverton was flooded and the rising of the Exe also caused the Quay itself to become a good few feet under water.

I had never, and to this day still have not, experienced quite the drenching I got that day walking through fast flowing streams over the city’s concrete and tarmac. I soon became so wet that I quickly reached the point of no longer caring as there was no where on my body left to be drenched.

At the time I remember cursing the increased amount of roads and concrete that may have led to increased run-off and therefore contributed to the floods but my thoughts did not immediately point the blame towards climate change. Weather is not climate, and in the middle of that down pour as much as I may have pondered the connection, such a claim could not be made.

Whilst watching the reporting and coverage of floods, hurricanes and other weather events that have had considerable impact over the decade since, I have often wanted to know if they are indicative of changes caused by global warming. Freak floods, heatwaves, droughts, increased numbers of events and so on seemed to be pointing towards climate change in my mind but that is not to say there is a demonstrable link between the two – climate science is anything but black and white.

Could it have also been that with the arrival of 24 hour news channels and my increased use of the internet for news and information, I and many others like me were and are, simply finding more information and being bombarded with coverage that in earlier years would have gone unseen or unheard?

So this week’s news came as welcome relief for my ponderings over a decade ago whilst drenched on my walk home from college.

The first study in the much discussed issue of Nature highlights how human induced increases in greenhouse gases have contributed to the observed intensification of heavy precipitation events in the Northern Hemisphere. The second shows that it is ‘very likely’ that global anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions substantially increased the risk of flood occurrence in England and Wales in the autumn of 2000, in which I only got soaked whilst many others suffered severe damage to their property and homes or their health.

The researchers in the latter study used several thousands of computer modelled sequences to determine whether increased CO2 levels affected the probability of the event occurring. They looked at scenarios with and without human induced greenhouse gas releases and found that in 9 out of 10 cases their model results indicated that twentieth-century anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions increased the risk of floods occurring in England and Wales in autumn 2000 by more than 20%, and in two out of three cases by more than 90%.

Not only I am glad to know that climate modelling and science is getting better, but I’m hopeful for how the study may change the way insurers, policy makers and leaders are going to have to think about climate change adaptation from now on when they deal with assessments of risk, probability and responsibility.

If the results of these two studies add to their understanding of global warming, as they have to mine, as a real and direct threat to today’s world and not just some distant future, perhaps they will help us move forward with speed and help us avoid getting caught in a storm.

Posted in Climate Change, News, Research | Leave a comment

UK to offer grants for electric cars

by Stefan Mustieles

The British Government has announced that 9 electric and ultra-low emission cars will be eligible for grants of up to £5,000. The government says that the grants “will be available to motorists across the UK from 1 January 2011, [and] will reduce the cost of eligible cars up to a quarter.”*

In addition to this, a number of incentives are also being introduced to encourage motorists to make their next car, a green car.

First of all £43m will be put aside to allow customers to receive a £5,000 grant towards the cost of a green car. A further £20m will be used to create 4,000 new electric charging points around the country. Even London Mayor Boris Johnson is chipping in with £1m to encourage London taxi drivers to convert their ‘Black Cabs’ in to ‘Green Cabs’.

Although a green car may increase the cost of your car insurance due to the technology involved there are plenty of other savings to be made. For drivers in and around London, £2000 can be saved by not having to pay the congestion charge. Green cars are exempt from road tax and it can cost as little as 2.0-2.5p per mile, saving as much as £800 a year on petrol costs.

So here are the nine cars that will start the ‘Green’ revolution in Britain.
** (including Government grant)

The Mitsubishi i-MiEV

• 63bhp
• Top speed: 80mph
• Eco-mode allowing travel up to 100 miles
• 0 – 60mph in less than nine seconds
• 4-occupant capacity
• Available from £23,990**

The Smart ForTwo electric drive

• 40bhp
• Top speed: 62mph
• Travel up to 84 miles
• 2-occupant capacity
• Price: N/A
• Available in 2012

The Peugeot iON

• 64bhp
• Top Speed: 81mph
• 0 – 60mph in 16 seconds
• Travel up to 93 miles on one charge
• Price: N/A

The Citroën CZero

• 64bhp
• Top Speed: 80mph
• 0 – 60mph in 15 seconds
• Travel Distance: 81 miles
• Price: Around £20000** (est)

The Nissan Leaf

• 120bhp
• Top Speed: 93mph
• 0 – 60mph in 7 seconds
• Price: £23,000*
• Voted Car of the Year 2011
• Cruising travel distance of up to 138 miles

The Tata Vista EV

• 0 – 60mph in under 10 seconds
• Top Speed: 71mph
• Travel distance up to 110 miles
• 4-occupant capacity

The Toyota Prius Plug-in

• Top Speed: 112mph
• 0 – 60mph in 13.7 seconds
• Full charge takes on 100 minutes
• Economy: 108.6mpg
• Price N/A

The Vauxhall Ampera

• Top Speed: 100mph
• 151bhp
• 1.4L petrol engine used to drive generator
• Price: £28,995**
• Available early 2012

The Chevrolet Volt

• Hybrid Car
• Battery range of only 35 miles
• Combustion engine runs on premium gas
• Total travel distance 379 miles
• Price: £20,000** (est)

*http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Nl1/Newsroom/DG_193151

Posted in Green living, News, Sustainability | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Article featured on Earthscan Blog

Very happy to say a previous post on this blog has been reposted on the Earthscan Blog.

Many thanks to Rachel and the folks at Earthscan publishing for picking up the article and posting it on their excellent blog. It is very pleasant to be posted alongside writers such as Tim Jackson, whose Prosperity Without Growth is a must read.

Thank you Earthscan.

Posted in Ecological economics, News, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Cancun COP 16: small islands plead for survival but US may walkout

COP 16

News comes today of small island nations such as those in the Caribbean and Cape Verde, pleading at the Cancun climate conference for a secured future safe from sea-level rise: “All of us face disaster. We don’t want to be the forgotten, the sacrificed countries of the 21st century.”

The Oxford University Centre for the Environment recently concluded that costs resulting from sea level rise on the Caricom islands “could amount to between $4bn and $6bn a year and with infrastructure costs running to tens of billions in many countries”.

Their report states that a 1 metre rise in sea-levels would see land being encroached by 100 metres, forcing more than 100,000 people to move and cause dramatic coastal erosion, which in turn would contaminate fresh water supplies and decimate the tourism industry.

The plea comes from islands who fear they will drown if world agreements limit global temperature rise to 2C rather than 1.5C.

Developed countries such as the USA, UK and EU member states are arguing in Cancun for a 2C limit to temperature rises and suggest that island states accept this and use adaptation funding to build sea defences.

It comes as no surprise then that the small islanders accuse the West of seeing them as ‘collateral damage’.

Rising tide

Current estimates have a broad range for predicted sea level rise this century, anywhere between 30cm and 1 metre by 2100.

But what this indicates is a commitment of the developed countries to a business-as-usual path of policy, with remuneration for adaptation being paid to the poorer countries set to be hit hardest first. The small countries are fighting hard to change this stance in Cancun but this power struggle and policy approach is at the heart of the problems of trying to reach agreements.

Inevitably, vulnerable states will not turn down money for adaptation and the rich countries know this. In time they will have no other choice.

It is this stance that is currently being held vehemently by the US and is shaping up to be a very much ‘all or nothing’ approach, much to the chagrin of developing countries the world over. As a result, there is currently much speculation over a potential walkout.

It’s only just begun so we’ll have to wait and see but again the dimensions of power will decide how things work out, instead of reasoned thought and sense.

Posted in Climate Change, News, Sustainability | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Leaders of the world: the celebrities have spoken!

By Rob Plastow

Photo taken from http://activate88.wordpress.com/

Who’s more powerful out of corporations, governments and celebrities?

Corporations often have more money than small nations and certainly have a lot of the larger countries by the balls in terms of economic growth and employment. But governments do have the power to change the law.

Celebrities on the other hand are usually fantastically wealthy, very attractive and as a result pretty much get whatever they want. It’s a tricky one and I raise the question due to a recent letter to world leaders, from a group of celebrities imploring progress at the upcoming UNFCCC conference in Cancun.

As most of the parties at COP 16 know – especially those from developed countries – issues surrounding climate change threaten global power relations, corporate power and global economics. This is because essentially, tackling climate change comes down to money and power.

There is a growing battle between those who have both and those who have neither; or from another angle: those who have a vested interest in maintaining the status quo upon which their wealth and power rest no matter the cost to future generations, and those who wish for a systemic, paradigmatic change in which that foundation is removed, or at least ameliorated to promote greater social and environmental justice.

One group of people who have lots of money and power, celebrities no less, have come together and written an open letter to world leaders asking them for progress on climate change in the coming COP16 in Cancun.

In keeping with their celebrity, sense of drama and flare, the letter is appropriately hyperbolic and doused in the same appeals to ‘history’ that preface epic blockbuster movies.

But I’m being cynical. This letter isn’t really for world leaders or even for the assistants to the ministers they will be sending to Cancun in their place. It’s for all the non-celebrities who listen to the celebrities for guidance on everything from make-up to politics and believe every word they say.

It’s really for us, the public at large in order to easily understand the event’s importance and sway us into giving our leaders grief in order to keep the provisions of the Kyoto Protocol alive.

Here it is for your persusal:

Letter to world leaders for COP 16

“A year ago world leaders gathered in Copenhagen to take on one of history’s greatest threats to humanity – climate change. Some important progress was made, but sadly not nearly enough. When they meet in Cancun next Monday for a new round of talks, they can make history. For millions on the frontlines of climate change, the time since Copenhagen has been the year from hell, as floods, droughts, fires, storms and other extreme weather events have wiped out crops and destroyed the livelihoods of some of the poorest people in the world (Report, 20 November). We know that the destructive impacts of climate change will mean more misery and pain for the world’s poor and increasing instability and insecurity unless action is taken. As leaders prepare for a new round of talks in Cancun next week, it is abundantly clear they must do better. And fast.

Climate funding to help poor communities protect themselves and develop in a low-carbon way could help break through the stalemate. Progress on setting up a new global climate fund that enables vulnerable people in poor countries – especially women, who bear the hardest burdens – to build resilience to growing threats could be the key to moving the world closer towards a global deal. A fair, effective and accountable UN body is needed to give voice to those who need the money most and can use it best.

These measures of success are within our grasp if world leaders seize this moment in Cancun. Time is running out, but it’s not too late to prevent a climate catastrophe. We look to them to play their part in the historic challenge of our time, so that a safer future is secured for us all and generations to come.”

Scarlett Johansson USA, Djimon Hounsou Benin, Gael García Bernal Mexico, Helena Christensen Denmark, Miguel Bosé Panama, Kristin Davis USA, Bill Nighy UK, Angelique Kidjo Benin, Ian McEwan UK, Jeremy Hobbes
Oxfam ambassadors and supporters

Posted in Climate Change, News | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

10 ways to save the world

There are hundreds of ways to save the world but let’s remember what we mean by ‘saving’ and ‘the world’.

For a start, it’s not about saving the planet, that’s not going anywhere and has dealt with more than we can imagine over billions of years. The world is us, our cultures, our societies, which all rest entirely upon the natural world, its ecology and all other life on earth. And our world most certainly depends on how each of us affects an other.

When it comes to saving, well, maybe that’s not the best word but it sticks. It’s about stopping ourselves from doing nothing and destroying things we can’t get back once gone. It’s about not taking things for granted and making things better where we can. It’s about not taking the status quo as immutable and omnipotent, instead seeing it as dependent on all of us determining what it is through the way we think about it.

With that in mind here’s 10 ways to save the world that will be running themes throughout this blog:

1. Reform our economic structures
2. Reduce consumption
3. Become less dependent on fossil fuels
4. Participate: get involved, be heard and listen to others
5. Question everything
6. Reduce, reuse and recycle
7. Embrace co-operation, not just competition
8. Stand up for social justice
9. Fight for global fair trade
10. Remember that everything is interconnected

Posted in 10 Ways, Climate Change, Ecological economics, Economics, Fair Trade, Green living, Sustainability, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Money, money, money

Posted in Ecological economics, Economics, Research | Leave a comment

Nature is for Christmas, not just for life

by Rob Plastow

I know. We haven’t even had COP16 yet. But there are 36 days to go until Christmas and so something should be said – I have held off.

Listed below are details with links to gift ideas, decorations and accessories that have a smaller ecological footprint than most of their standard alternatives and I will post more as I find them in the coming weeks.

I have found that a lot of places on the web seem to make a ‘green’ Christmas a bit of a turn-off, often sounding very frugal and Scrooge-like when noting to be mindful of your waste and over-consumption at Christmas.

Here are ideas for gifts and decorations that are no different from the usual fare but have either been recycled, are energy efficient or are options you might not have thought of that can actually make a difference to the world.

Decorations:
Deck the halls with energy efficient LED Christmas lights, which are up to 90% more efficient than incandescent bulbs and last around 35,000 hours. They don’t get hot, are durable and if one of the lights goes out all the others stay lit.

Trees:

When it comes to buying a tree this year, there are some very good options provided by the Ecologist , who say in their Christmas Guide:

‘Buy from a small-scale sustainable grower and/or make sure your Christmas tree has Forest Steward Council (FSC) accreditation. See www.soilassociation.org/christmas for a list of producers.

Have a live Christmas tree in a pot that you can take outside to the garden and use next year. If replanting isn’t an option and you buy a cut tree then don’t throw it out with the rubbish. Most local councils run Christmas tree recycling schemes, or try www.letsrecycle.com

If you live in or near London, buy your tree from the
Christmas Forest, an independent ‘tree-tailer’ that sells trees at seven sites around the city. Trees are sustainably sourced – every tree cut is replaced by a new one, mostly in the UK to minimise tree miles. For each tree sold, another is planted in on the Forests for Food project in Ethiopia through Tree Aid.’

Alternatively, you can rent one from: http://www.christmastreehire.net/ or if you live near Dorset try http://www.treesforrent.com/

Gift ideas:

Cool Earth can help you save the rainforest and give a gift at the same time this Christmas. They have got some very surprising gift ideas for your loved ones, ranging from protecting a tree to an acre of rainforest, as well as helping indigenous communities by selling their handmade jewelry for them and offering you the chance to give them canoe fuel for a year, farming tools, mosquito nets, solar panels, or help fund female enterprise initiatives and buy textbooks for schools. Each gift comes with a certificate and you can track your tree in Google Earth.

“Each tree plays a vital role in the biodiversity of the rainforest. When you protect a tree you receive a special certificate via email or through the post. View it’s location in your Cool Earth account. Help fight climate change and keep this tree standing.” www.coolearth.org

Dedicate a tree to someone through the Woodland Trust http://woodlandtrustshop.com/dedicate-a-tree

Or…

Send someone on an eco-course. For online listings of providers of green courses in the UK visit www.allthingseco.co.uk

Stationary and stuff:

Recycled Xmas cards: http://www.nigelsecostore.com/acatalog/Christmas_Cards.html

Wrapping paper: ’100% recycled wrapping paper is available from the Natural Collection, where six sheets, plus matching tags, will cost you £4.50.
Alternatively, recycled brown paper is also greener than conventional wrapping paper, and can look good on your presents. Recycle your own by saving any that comes wrapped around a parcel, or buy it from WWF‘. – taken from the Guardian’s Ultimate Green Christmas Guide.

Posted in Fair Trade, Green living, Sustainability | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Prosperity without growth

Following on from his book Prosperity Without Growth: Economics for a Finite Planet this video is of Tim Jackson at TED earlier this year.

Posted in Climate Change, Ecological economics, Economics, Research, Sustainability, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Sustainability news highlights

By Rob Plastow


In the last week we have seen another step towards achieving the coalition’s Big Society, wherein the state shrinks and business grows. A week ago the government announced it is looking to McDonalds and PepsiCo for its new food policy amidst the department spending cuts; this time it’s the forests that face the chop – financially that is.

The public forests that are open and enjoyed by everyone are set to be sold off, which on the face of it may appear innocuous – however, key to remember is that even if you may still get to enjoy them if publicly of privately owned, you only get a say in what happens to them as long as they are public property. They currently cost each taxpayer 30p a year and are worth keeping hold of as far as Caroline Lucas, Green Party Leader and MP for Brighton explains in the Guardian.

Cancun, Climategate and Copenhagen

There have also been a quite a lot of articles looking back on the Copenhagen conference of last year as well as the Climategate debacle. Mike Hulme, professor of climate change in the School of Environmental Sciences at the University of East Anglia writes of how the last 12 months have redefined climate science here.

As well as this retrospective from the New Economics Foundation, ‘A year on from climategate, what have we learnt?’

In addition, good old Richard Black writes in his BBC Earth Watch blog about the coming conference in Cancun and also looks back to this time last year.

The Governator set to terminate climate change

Yes, Arnie may be coming to the end of the road as Governor of California but he’s warning he’ll be back as a green champion and make climate change sexy. Find out more here.

Posted in Climate Change, News, Sustainability | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment